Blood Alcohol Content Essay

The thought of alcohol organism involved in opprobrious crashes brings about an feelingal response. Recently, there has been a movement based on emotion rather than logic to compound a certain drinking and movement fairness. This involves lowering the Blood alcoholic beverage Content (BAC) from 0. 10% to 0. 08% nationwide. However, this attention is misdirected. By looking at my ad hominem experiences, statistics, and current justices, it is clear that there is no need for lowering the BAC. start-off off, I do not drink.Yet, Ive had many experiences relating to drinking and driving through my friends. One thing Ive noticed is that it is extremely severely for wad to tell if they are judicially intoxicated or not. Further more, I impart never heard any of my friends say that they feel that they should tug home because they thrust only a . 09% BAC. The law has very pocket-size effect on how many drinks a person decides to consume. Therefore, lowering the legal drunk lim it will not result in people acting more responsible. Supporters of lowering the BAC like Judith Lee Stone in her essay YES think they are targeting the problem of drunken driving, but the objective problem lies within the higher BACs. Ninety three percent of fatal accidents are 0. 10% BAC and above, and half of those ninety three percent have a BAC of 0. 20% and above. The average BAC for fatal accidents is at actually at 0. 17%. This seems like a more logical target for unfermented laws then 0. 08%. Furthermore, Stone asks Who would want their children in a car control by someone who has consumed three, four, or even more beers in an second (Stone 46)? I couldnt agree more.However, this common contrast from the pro-0. 08% side is more like a parent responsibility question. They use this to manipulate our emotion by putting an innocent child in an improbable and uncorrelated situation. She also goes on to landed estate, A study at Boston University make up that 500 to 600 fewer high focussing deaths would occur annually if all states espouse 0. 08% (Stone 47). On the other hand, a similar study at University of normality Carolina shows no signifi abidet change after their adoption of 0. 08%. Which study is even up?Most likely, both have some truthfulness. It could be either way depending on the state. The lowering of the Blood Alcohol Content percentage law is unnecessary and useless. Nevertheless, some states have already moved to the 0. 08%, and we hear the argument It makes no sense for a driver to be lawfully drunk in one state but not in other (Stone 46). To that, I ask a couple questions of my own. Why can I carry a concealed gun in one state and not another? Why is it that I can drive a certain speed in one state, but a opposite speed in another?The response to those questions and Stones story is all of the above are state laws. At this point, the federal administration seems to get confused. In October 2000, congress passed a law that uses the states money against them. It asserts that if a state doesnt lower its BAC percentage to 0. 08% by 2003, it will pull away two percent of its track money. States that dont like the law will be forced to vote for it because they are desperate for highway construction money. Strings shouldnt be attached to this money.What are lost(p) in all of this are the current laws for drunk driving. Driving art object impaired is already illegal whether the person political campaigns 0. 04% or 0. 10%. Courts can use alcohol test of 0. 04% and higher as evidence of impairment. Its at 0. 10% where a person is legally drunk and cannot legally operate a vehicle. Therefore, its not as if people who test 0. 08% are going unpunished like the other side would have you believe. In conclusion, anybody who picks out one particular aspect and says that it is not work hasnt looked that the whole problem.The president for the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Brian O Neill, says that hed rather see resources directed toward enforcing existing drunken driving laws. Hopefully, with more education, more awareness, and more enforcement we can successfully slash drinking and driving fatalities. Bibliography Stone, Judith Lee. Yes. Reading and Writing Short Arguments. Ed. William Vesterman. Mountain View, calcium Mayfield Publishing Company, 2000. 46-47. Word Count 702.