Enlightened Philosophers (John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Jean Jacques Rousseau)

John fructify to sleepe, Baron de Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Jean Jacques Rousseau were alone learning philosophers. Each of these work force had a particular view of presidency, society, and its citizens and they were all fervent nearly their works. Locke (1632- 1704) was an English philosopher, his ideas had a cracking impact on the evolution of political philosophy and he is widely regarded as one of the near influential enlightenment imagineers. Montesquieu (1689- 1755) believed that all things were made up of laws that never changed. His approximately famous work, The Spirit of Laws, outlined his ideas on how government would work best.Voltaire (1694- 1778) was a poet, an essayist, playw adjust, historian, and above all, a critic of society. He was a great social reformer for liberty and was twice imprisoned for his writings. Rousseau (1712-1778) generally recycled older enlightenment ideas save is well known for his passionate rhetoric, which enflamed a generation and beyond. John Lockes view of government was that it was ethical to pretend one. The populate whitethorn ordinate their trust in the government so that in turn, the government whitethorn trust the community and harbor their rights. The curtilage why men read and give military unit to lawmakers is that there may be made, and rules set, as guards and fences The mint are right in trying to put the laws in the detainment of the government which go a focusing protect their rights. (Excerpt from Lockes Two Treatises with Government) . Within the government, there were societies. Lock felt that the nation needed/ wanted a government to protect their rights. They dont, however, want to be victims of power abuse by the government. The reason why men enter into society is to preserve their property. Two Treatises with Government) . all society is made up of citizens he believed that People (lawmakers) pull up stakes needs abuse their power at some point. When this happens, nation should brace the right to break free from the government. When lawmakers abuse absolute power and try to reward away and destroy the property of the muckle The mint are thusly freed from any further obedience to lawmakers (Two Treatises with Government) . If Locke were alive during the Renaissance period, his views may start out shifted.Lock may have been less bold nearly his reasons why men enter into a society. The renaissance was a clock cadence of stop and prosperity. Humanism, self awareness, art, and science were a big deal and his view of the great unwashed and their state in nature may have changed because people were cerebration differently during those clock. During the Protestant Reformation, times were also different and his opinion may have altered again. Locke may have not cared around the people as a lot because he was too busy criticizing the government/ church buildinges.The Protestant Reformation was a time where people were very critical of the churches because they mistreat their power which is one of Lockes philosophies people want to be protected by the government, not abused. During the Scientific Revolution, however, people were big on science and the people not so much the churches/ government so Lockes view may have changed again. He probably would feel the corresponding way astir(predicate) the government nevertheless less harsh about the people. As times change, so do peoples opinions. Baron de Montesquieu believed in a government or so different than Lockes.Montesquieu still believed in a central government but he thought that laws should be specific to different parts of the introduction where as different law may have to be implement in different places. In his most famous work, The Spirit of Laws, Montesquieu says Lawsshould be adapted for the people for whom they are framedthey should be relative to the humour of each country, to the quality of its soil Montesquieus view of society, however, diff ered very much from Lockes. Montesquieu felt that people become intoxicated on power when they have enough of it and they couldnt handle having more than the person next to them. governmental liberty can only be found in reclaim governments when there is no abuse of power. (The Spirit of Laws) Montesquieu feels the same way about individual citizens as he does about the general society. People ever abuse their powers. No matter how small the amount they have, they will labour their credibility to the edge. Constant experience shows us that every man invested with power is apt to abuse it and carry it as far as it will go. (The Spirit of Laws) . As the renaissance came around, Montesquieu would definitely not have had much(prenominal) a bad opinion of man.As previously mentioned, the renaissance was a time for prosperity and there was a focus on humanism. Montesquieu believed that men will abuse any power that they are given but during the renaissance, people were much differen t. As for the Protestant Reformation, Montesquieu would probably feel the same way as his cowcatcher philosophy. Nobody liked each other during the Protestant Reformation but the liked the government/ churches up to now less. Theres no doubt that people would abuse their power and the government should be split in 3 sections.However, during the Scientific Revolution, Montesquieu would feel the same about the people and probably would view the government the same way. During the Scientific Revolution, people were recovering from the Protestant Reformation but it was the abuse of power that put them there in the inaugural place and they needed a perpetual government. Jean Jacques Rousseau was similar to Locke in his belief of a government. Rousseau believes that government is requisite for stability but only to an extent. If the king/ government should go against the people, they have a right to demand their freedom. No one not even a king has the right to go against the commun ity as a whole. If a ruler was tyrannical and went against the will of the people the social take up is broken and the people had a right to demand their freedom (The brotherly Contract). Rousseaus view of society was also good in that he did not criticize anything he merely made the observation that in a society, people all have to abide by all the same rules because this keeps them at bay. The essence of the social contract can be stated simply each individual surrenders all his rights to the community (The affectionate Contract). Rousseaus view of citizens basically adds onto his view of how they react in society. He believes that people want to live amongst each other in cessation they want to be protected and live by original guidelines to batten prosperity. During the Protestant Reformation, Rousseaus ideas would have changed drastically. People were definitely not lifetime in peace and the government/churches were what got them into a mess in the first place. During th e Protestant Reformation people were basically at war with the church and anyone who disagreed with their opinion.During the Scientific Revolution, people need a stable government because of what happened during the Protestant Reformation. However, people also wanted to live in peace with the government and their neighbors and whoever else. Rousseau would have felt the same about the government and about how people were living their lives during the Scientific Revolution as he would have from his original philosophy. Voltaire does not seem to care much for the government, He was a great crusader for liberty and was twice imprisoned for his writings. His view of society was that people should be accepting and understanding of each other when people do not accept each other and their ways of thinking, nothing good will come of it. Tolerance has never brought about civil war. credulity has covered the earth with destruction (A Treatise on Toleration). When it comes to individuals, Vo ltaire is lighter with his words he doesnt penalize them for his distaste in the government. Voltaire believed that people should have certain unalienable rights that cannot be revoked unless they are causing some sort of a public disturbance. Each person must be permitted to believe and to think that which he rightly believes in. Each person should be able to utter freely as long as it does not disturb the public order. Each person must be able to freely radiation pattern any religion which he believes in (A Treatise on Toleration). Voltaire would have the same feelings about the government and about the people during the Protestant Reformation. It was a time when nobody liked the government/ churches and the people wanted their rights because they were losing faith in religion.During the Scientific Revolution people wanted their rights because they werent big on religion anymore, so, Voltaire probably would have felt the same way as his original writings. In conclusion, each p hilosopher had their own ideas and ways of thinking about the government, different societies, and its citizens. Each man may have also been influenced differently by the Renaissance, Protestant Reformation, or the Scientific Revolution. These enlightenment philosophers have unexpended their mark on history and will always be remembered as influential figures.