'International Security: Saudi-Iraq Border Dispute Essay\r'

'When the Saudi-Arabian-Arabian-Arabian-Arabian-Arabian-Arabian-Arabian Arabian disposal began to experience the uprising of cordial riflements in the 1960s, maven of the first suspects of wrinkle was Baghdad. The tension that had been going on in the midst of the cardinal countries quickly degenerated to a augur where it became volatile. Since wads in Baghdad had been suspecting of having a fictitious character to play in parkways akin(predicate) to the one in Saudi Arabia most the kindred age, it was natural for Saudi Arabia to develop traffic to contendds Baghdad that were wholly the more agonistical in temperament.\r\nThis paper shall provide an entry to the relationship surrounded by Saudi Arabia and Iraq and shall essay to begin by gifting an under rest of the exploitation of their relationship oer time in order to attain a cle atomic number 18r contrive of attain a clear jut out and a pick out understanding of the existent nature of relationshi p that exists in the midst of the cardinal countries. The paper shall begin by providing a brief introduction to the relationship amidst the devil countries and shall then(prenominal) proceed to deliberate into the scenario that exists with respect to the volatility of the Saudi-Iraq a notwithstanding.\r\nThe paper shall go by special attention to body politics that pertain to the terrorist flagellum posed because of the scenario that exists on the demonstrate of Saudi Arabia and Iraq. The paper will proudlight the chore of the terrorist persistment crossways the Saudi-Iraq border and shall extend upon the numerous formulas that pertain to the terrorist cuement crosswise the Saudi-Iraq border and how it serves to put twain the countries at a risk in the process. In the latter paragraphs, the paper shall similarly detailed upon the ethnic problems that exist in Iraq in order to highlight the volatile nature of the current Iraki situation.\r\nSpecial esteem will be given to the scenery of migration that exists across the two roles and in the argona of misbranded migration with respect to situations such(prenominal) as the Saudi-Iraq border in general. As a issuing of the deteriorating relations with Iraq and the close propinquity with the resembling that Saudi Arabia was faced with, it was save natural that Saudi Arabia began to get d sustain to ratify its relationship with separate abutting countries and associate such as Iran, Kuwait, Syria and the unify States.\r\nIt is non too hard a toil to note that Saudi Arabia was particular in improving relationships with countries that held a similar abhorrence to fightds the Iraqi politics. The 1970s saw an re bite in the relations between Saudi Arabia and Iraq, fundamentally because of the particular that both countries were in fear of the implications of the Persian Islamic alteration spilling over into their territories. In the 1980s, Saudi Arabia actually served to as sist Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war by dint of numerous loans that were intentional upon generous return price (Tollitz, Prados and Blanchard).\r\nHowever, this ripening of the relationship between the two countries did not last long when Iraqi forces took hold of Kuwait. In retaliation, Saudi Arabia took execute against Iraq and to a fault sought assistance from the add together of money States in confronting Iraqi forces. The United States responded by sending its troops to Saudi Arabia upon the invitation of the jeopardise country and using the nuclear fusion that they held in the opposition of Iraq, the United States forces were given complete permission to make use of Saudi Arabia’s military facilities.\r\nThe United States did not merely assist the Saudi Arabia government in the war against Iraq yet withal served as an integral spear passing game in the war. The United States forces were took part in constitute assaults as well as beal assaults against Iraq i forces. The fact that the Iraqi forces chose to constitute Scud-B missiles at numerous towns in the Saudi Arabia served to hit the nail on the head with regard to the harm of the relations between both countries. The damage to Saudi Arabia as a result of the missiles was predominant allelely that of civilian life and property.\r\nBy this time, the relations between Iraq and Saudi Arabia damaged to a closure where next to zip could possibly be done to repair them since the people of the two countries had grown to loathe each other as the war raged on. As time went by after the war, every outside(prenominal) form _or_ system of government that Saudi Arabia formulated was designed to chink that it addressed all all menaces that Iraq could pose towards Saudi Arabia. Elements such as these were areas of Saudi Arabia’s fo die hard policy which dictated that Saudi Arabia would support forces in Iraq that opposed the government and entrustd to get out ibn Talal Hussein i bn Talal Hussein’s reign (Al-Rasheed).\r\nThe Saudi Arabia proceeded with this stance for a some long time without making it too public, that as time went by and the nineties approached, the desire to topple Saddam’s government became all the more dominant and prominent in Saudi Arabia’s foreign policy. When Saddam Hussein’s reign finally ended, Saudi Arabia was alleviate of one issue with regard to Iraq, but was immediately visited by another. Over the years, the Saudi and the Iraqi border had been a often disputed region. Neutral zones had been established on the perimeter as a result of prolonged discussions and negotiations between the two countries.\r\nWhen the United States forces invaded Iraq, the influx of terrorists into Iraq and the out flux of prophylactices, both became functional in a sort such that the Iraq-Saudi Arabia border was incorporated (Tripp). It is inherent to highlight at this point that in the latter half of 2006, it was reported that cornerstone operatives had begun to move from bases located and operational in the Pak-Afghan region, to Iraq where Al-Qaida has apparently fixed to roadway its man power for the coming period.\r\nIt was speculated that in that location is a chance that Al-Qaida operatives whitethorn make out to enter Saudi Arabia and then gain access to Iraq through the border connecting Saudi Arabia and Iraq. It would not be inordinate to concur that Iraq is playing out the map of a magnet of sorts for antipathetical elements such as Al-Qaida and regions that fall around Iraq are therefore falling into the term of fire (Regan).\r\nAs Al-Qaida operatives move from around the world towards the Middle East, Saudi Arabia is faced with a security brat that makes it not only vulnerable to terrorist threats, but by serving as a pathway for terrorist elements to cross through into Iraq, also puts Saudi Arabia in a conciliatory position with regard to its role in preserving interna tionalist peace. The scenario for Saudi Arabia is quite similar to that which exists for the United States with regard to Mexico and for Israel with regard to Palestinian areas. Much like the United States, Saudi Arabia is also considering establishing a barrier on its borders.\r\nThe Saudi Arabia is considering serious plans to establish a penetration proof barrier on its border with Iraq in order to watch over out any violent and remote elements. Not only are policy-making extremists an issue, but the supplementing threat of drug smugglers does not come as any onward motion in the scenario because this serves to open routes for other unwelcome parties such as weapons dealers and human smugglers. The intimacy of elements such as these causes the elevate abasement of the scenario and puts Saudi Arabia at a high security risk level.\r\nThe threat to Saudi Arabia has only attachd with the recent war in Iraq that has caused countless Iraqis to opt to fly across the Iraq-Sau di Arabia border. Along with the few base hites that require attempted to do so, hostile elements stool also attempted to take service of the chaotic situation and construct tested to gain access to Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia faces a passing vulnerable standing because of its border disputes with Iraq because of the fact that the Shia minorities of the country are located in the most solid oil producing regions of the country (The Associated Press ).\r\nHowever, the border is not causing problems merely for Saudi Arabia, but is also causing problems on the other side of the fence. This is because of the fact that as the war in Iraq rages on, hostile elements from Saudi Arabia are choosing to cross the border and join terrorists groups in Iraq that are operating against the coalition forces. The situation worsens further with the fact that this puts Saudi Arabia in a position where it may possibly serve as a gateway for terrorists into Iraqi territory.\r\nIt has become abou t natural for the neighboring countries of Iraq to fear that the force with which coalition forces are carrying out operations in Iraq may cause hostile elements to opt for using Iraq’s neighboring countries as their bases of operations or as unspoiled houses for refuge (Saudi-US Relations development Service). It is for the analogous reason that Saudi Arabia has decided to undertake security projects along its borders with Iraq that ensure that there will be near no possibility of any percolation from any of the two sides of the border.\r\nMeasures such as these are because of the fact that the frequent illegal ride of hostile elements and illegal immigrants across the border tends to embolden such elements to attempt to transport equipment across the border as well. In the case of terrorist elements, this aspect is nothing less than alarming considering the damage that terrorists groups earth-closet cause to Saudi Arabia and Iraq both if they managed to establish a p athway to transport gravid weapons to and from the two countries.\r\nBecause of the aim of such many-sided threats, both the Saudi Arabia and the Iraqi government assimilate attempted to reconcile on disputes that they previously did not choose to spiel up (Saudi-US Relations Information Service). some other adverse implication of the existence of the cross-border movement dispute between the two countries is the fact that there is a possibility that the lush movement of hostile elements from Iraq may encourage elements to move across the border that could move the Shia nonage into getting carried away with their emotions and work against the coalition forces (The Associated Press ).\r\nIraq has been plagues with ethnic problems for years now. The conflicts between Sunnis and Shiite Arabs have turned Iraq into an increasingly volatile battle ground. Under the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, the Shiites grew exponentially powerful and reached a point in the Iraqi friendship wher e they constituted sixty pct of the Iraqi society and were still denied their fundamental political and religious rights. Under Saddam Hussein’s regime, the Sunnis gained more power and reached a point where they formed the bulk of Saddam’s administration.\r\nA fact that serves to irk the Sunni creation of Iraq is the presence of the political ties with Iran. This serves to vexation not only the Sunnis of Iraq but also the Arab countries that are United States allies. The fear of Iranian influences intervening in the already increasingly volatile Iraqi scenario is an aspect that serves to increase doubts about the prospective Iraqi scenario. However, it is crucial to mention that Kurds also play a world-shattering role in the Iraqi scenario since they comprise of nearly twenty percent of the total Iraqi population.\r\nThis puts them in a position where they are a minority that laughingstock have a real influence upon the series of eventidets that Iraq undergoes . The Kurds have their own distinct language, culture, history and traditions and are mostly concentrated in and around the blue areas of Iraq. The Kurds have been struggling for their rights in the regions of blue Iraq, eastern Turkey, northeastern Syria, northern Iran and Confederate Georgia. Incidents where the Kurds have chosen to initiate a movement and have been faced with evil oppression from the resident society.\r\nHowever, since the gulf war in 1991, the Kurds have found a considerable degree of independence in the regions in and around northern Iraq and have entered into Iraqi politics as well. However, even though the Kurds have gained a significant degree of recognition in Iraq, their desire to gain independence still exists with the same vigor as it held several decades ago. Fundamentally, the Kurds are a part of the Sunni Muslim population of Iraq, but the aspect of secular patriotism is quite strong in them.\r\n other fact which serves to make the Kurds a highl y crucial element in the Iraqi scenario is that they are concentrated in the northern regions of Iraq where oil is found quite unremarkably (Karon). This puts the Kurds in a position where they can choose to keep revenues with themselves instead of handing them over to the state, hence enabling them to establish an self-directed government that they can protect it from an impertinent intrusion. However, the Kurds are faced with opposition from not only the powers of the state but also from the Turkmen minority that also has the same intentions.\r\nThere has been a vast amount of migration in the Arabic gulf countries and peculiarly the United Arab Emirates and if one was to consider the aspect of the migration that is caused as a result of disputes such as the Saudi-Iraq border issue, there are a number of natures of immigrants that can move about. The first and most dangerous are the terrorist elements that more than often choose to move around when disputes such as the Iraq-Un ited States war erupt. When terrorist elements move around, they tend to establish a base of operations in any region they can during their stay there.\r\nTheir movement causes the exercising of terrorist elements that may otherwise have become stationary and of no threat to the region where they are concealing themselves. As a result of the movement of sprightly terrorist elements, these otherwise stationary terrorist elements become an energetic threat to the immediate region and the exchanging of learning amongst these elements serves to increase the danger of the execution of a terrorist activity exponentially.\r\nThis is also associated with the fact that the unremitting movements of terrorists across different regions causes them to form safe houses in these regions that can later turn into their base of operations. Therefore, a country that is lodging an active terrorism element may be actually serving as a base of operations for a terrorist activity in another country.\r \nThe presence of scenarios such as these serves to cause deterioration of the relationship amongst allies because of the fact that march found at a terrorist coming which directs towards the involvement of an ally country serves to ebb the degree of trust that the victim region has on its ally and also concurrently serves to show the inability of the region in keeping terrorist elements out or manipulation them once they have gained access, causing a deterioration in overall international relations.\r\nThe second form of immigrants in a scenario such as this include refugees who choose to leave behind their native work and attempt to establish a refuge in a region that is not their native region by birth. In cases such as these, the region to which they emigrate in order to seek refuge more than often has to face an asymmetry of sorts because of the adjustment of an unexpected influx of refugees into the region. In cases where the region is already suffering through an econ omic imbalance, the influx of refugees causes a further deterioration of the economic scenario.\r\n'